PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.13%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 8.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
60.12%
Positive gross profit growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
41.06%
EBIT growth below 50% of 1097.HK's 114.58%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
41.04%
Operating income growth under 50% of 1097.HK's 114.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
68.98%
Positive net income growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 1097.HK's 7.37%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.52%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 1097.HK's 8.30%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
331.97%
OCF growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 8.96%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-84.41%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 1097.HK's 61.10%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 1097.HK's 117.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
370.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 130.38%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 1097.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.34%
SG&A growth of 81.34% while 1097.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.