PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.89%
Positive revenue growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
40.97%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 5.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
202.77%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 8.01%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
202.77%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 7.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
182.82%
Net income growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 87.97%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.68%
Slight or no buybacks while 1097.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
9.68%
Slight or no buyback while 1097.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.44%
Positive OCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
158.50%
FCF growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 80.87%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 36.79%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3818.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 4.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
170.08%
Below 50% of 1097.HK's 372.52%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.91%
We expand SG&A while 1097.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.