PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.51%
Share reduction while 1097.HK is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while 1097.HK is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.51%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 1097.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
0.00%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x 1097.HK's 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
0.00%
FCF growth under 50% of 1097.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 1097.HK's 75.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-7.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 10.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.43%
Below 50% of 1097.HK's 127.62%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
137.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 1097.HK's 187.41%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-25.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is 72.66%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.67%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.67% while 1097.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.