PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 30.92%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
20.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
25.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
151.98%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
143.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
171.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
377.96%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 89.39% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
297.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
239.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.77%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1097.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-61.21%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.