PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.61%
Revenue growth under 50% of 1097.HK's 14.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.58%
Positive gross profit growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-11.10%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.60%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.90%
Positive net income growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
7.52%
Slight or no buybacks while 1097.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.21%
Slight or no buyback while 1097.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
540.46%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 1097.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-9.43%
Negative OCF growth while 1097.HK is at 20.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-44.60%
Negative FCF growth while 1097.HK is at 44.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-15.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 28.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
17.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
19.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4054.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2830.25%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
9.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
106.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
220.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
553.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
459.48%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 1097.HK cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.46%
SG&A growth well above 1097.HK's 2.32%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.