1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 20.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
17.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
22.32%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4159.27%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2826.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
12.05%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
111.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
220.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
566.17%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
470.39%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 1097.HK cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.