PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 145.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-99.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 56.83%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-99.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 105.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-66.81%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-55.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-67.26%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 148.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-102.49%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-110.19%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-103.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5546.99%
Stable or rising dividend while 1097.HK is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
12036.01%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while 1097.HK is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
1144.67%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 1097.HK cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.13%
Inventory is declining while 1097.HK stands at 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.