PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-56.15%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
4.21%
Positive gross profit growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.36%
Positive operating income growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
63.57%
Positive net income growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
64.07%
Positive EPS growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
64.07%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-200.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-99.95%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 15.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-99.95%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 55.07%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
84.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 28.95%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-233.73%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-154.89%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-160.41%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-232.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-133.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-179.33%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1612.24%
We expand SG&A while 1097.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.