PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14114.39%
Positive revenue growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-38888.36%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-212.09%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-439.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-438.03%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-438.03%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.25%
Positive OCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
52.52%
Positive FCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-92.12%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-93.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK stands at 25.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-589.49%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-125.25%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.25%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-289.32%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
820.38%
SG&A growth well above 1097.HK's 3.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.