PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.19%
Positive revenue growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-16.23%
Negative gross profit growth while 1097.HK is at 13.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1724.67%
Negative EBIT growth while 1097.HK is at 3.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
2.41%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 1097.HK's 3.48%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-2395.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2389.16%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2389.16%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.16%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 1097.HK's 1.48%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 1097.HK's 1.48%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.59%
Positive OCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
20.17%
Positive FCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-33.59%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
64142.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
815.52%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-121.97%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-20.09%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
22.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 12.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-217.80%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-29.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-22.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is 51.05%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.75%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-26.24%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.73%
Inventory growth well above 1097.HK's 14.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
11.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of 1097.HK's 34.89%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-7.74%
We have a declining book value while 1097.HK shows 12.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
390.08%
Debt growth far above 1097.HK's 95.44%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
306.60%
We expand SG&A while 1097.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.