PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.96%
Positive revenue growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
159.62%
Gross profit growth similar to 1097.HK's 149.98%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
191.42%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 4.58%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
161.85%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 6.72%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
181.23%
Net income growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 5.95%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
175.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 6.08%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
175.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 6.08%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
7.72%
Share change of 7.72% while 1097.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
9.87%
Diluted share change of 9.87% while 1097.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
621.17%
OCF growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 102.03%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
299.67%
FCF growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 84.85%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
36.02%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1934.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
501.36%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
11.06%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
539.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 105.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
558.73%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 101.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-19.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 1097.HK is at 38.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
142.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 59.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
203.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 64.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.26%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-4.31%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.86%
We show growth while 1097.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
15.61%
Positive asset growth while 1097.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
28.61%
Positive BV/share change while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-57.16%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.11%
We expand SG&A while 1097.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.