PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.19%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 0.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.62%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 1097.HK's 10.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-184.03%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-269.98%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-184.58%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-188.40%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-188.40%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.15%
Share change of 0.15% while 1097.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-4.03%
Reduced diluted shares while 1097.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
262.25%
OCF growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 45.46%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
607.60%
Positive FCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
619104.39%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1092.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
181.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-38.63%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
260.50%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
283.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-358.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 1097.HK is at 2.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
45.57%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 1097.HK's 56.43%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
-1162.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is 17.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
152.31%
Positive growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-8.90%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
7.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-42.33%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.08%
We show growth while 1097.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.43%
Positive asset growth while 1097.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.19%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
39.38%
We have some new debt while 1097.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.23%
SG&A growth well above 1097.HK's 1.89%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.