PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.24%
Positive revenue growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.44%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 1.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
205.59%
Positive EBIT growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
191.41%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 3.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
257.75%
Positive net income growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
258.37%
Positive EPS growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
247.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.35%
Share change of 0.35% while 1097.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
3.58%
Diluted share change of 3.58% while 1097.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 1097.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.36%
Positive OCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-100.49%
Negative FCF growth while 1097.HK is at 27.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
728.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
172.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
381.65%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 88.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
361.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 21.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 54.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
172.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 3.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
23.35%
Positive short-term equity growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.54%
We show growth while 1097.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.96%
Positive asset growth while 1097.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.34%
Positive BV/share change while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.30%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 1097.HK's 17.65%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.35%
We expand SG&A while 1097.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.