PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.84%
Negative revenue growth while 1097.HK stands at 7.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.95%
Negative gross profit growth while 1097.HK is at 195.64%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-64.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-31.31%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.27%
Share change of 0.27% while 1097.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.55%
Reduced diluted shares while 1097.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.69%
OCF growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 5.16%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
45912.08%
Positive FCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
98192.55%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
489.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
115.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
248.29%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
342.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 70.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
596.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1097.HK's 84.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1844.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
168.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
155.77%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-4.80%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
3.97%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
35.34%
Positive short-term equity growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-94.27%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1097.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.27%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 1097.HK's 15.03%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-61.88%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
15.45%
Debt growth far above 1097.HK's 12.64%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 1097.HK's 63.29%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.