PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.45%
Revenue growth under 50% of 1097.HK's 27.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.25%
Positive gross profit growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-89.47%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-530.70%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-107.21%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-107.36%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.79%
Share reduction while 1097.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.94%
Reduced diluted shares while 1097.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.89%
Positive OCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
89.37%
Positive FCF growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
40423.24%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
257.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
32.25%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
228.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
314.45%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-18.70%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
90.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-145.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-104.66%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3.96%
Positive growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
4.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while 1097.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1097.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
We show growth while 1097.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.51%
Negative asset growth while 1097.HK invests at 5.30%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-12.81%
We’re deleveraging while 1097.HK stands at 29.92%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.23%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 1097.HK's 97.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08