PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.89%
Negative revenue growth while 1113.HK stands at 6.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.07%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-83.31%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-81.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while 1113.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.07%
Slight or no buyback while 1113.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
81.69%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 1113.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-50.82%
Negative OCF growth while 1113.HK is at 603.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-226.06%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-7.62%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.87%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
136.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 48.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-26.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1113.HK is 48.52%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.13%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while 1113.HK is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.38%
We cut SG&A while 1113.HK invests at 7.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.