PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 1113.HK's 111.37%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
20.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
25.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
151.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 63.43%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
143.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
171.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
377.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
297.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 48.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
239.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 48.52%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.77%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-61.21%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.