PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-78.03%
Negative revenue growth while 1113.HK stands at 38.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
110.95%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 1113.HK's 18.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.65%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-275.68%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-281.68%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-281.68%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.22%
Share count expansion well above 1113.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
63.62%
OCF growth under 50% of 1113.HK's 252.61%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
62.89%
FCF growth under 50% of 1113.HK's 762.90%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-99.87%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 22.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-99.90%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 22.61%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 490.65%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-118.30%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK is at 490.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-465.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-191.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1113.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.24%
We have a declining book value while 1113.HK shows 11.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.