1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14114.39%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 1113.HK's 44.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-38888.36%
Negative gross profit growth while 1113.HK is at 28.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-212.09%
Negative operating income growth while 1113.HK is at 25.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-439.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-438.03%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-438.03%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.25%
Positive OCF growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
52.52%
Positive FCF growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-92.12%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 84.87%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-93.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 84.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-589.49%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 40.39%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-125.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK is at 40.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.25%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-289.32%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
820.38%
SG&A growth well above 1113.HK's 45.67%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.