PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.15%
Positive revenue growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
117.51%
Positive gross profit growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.99%
Positive operating income growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
78.22%
Positive net income growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
77.46%
Positive EPS growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
77.46%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.20%
Positive OCF growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-4.08%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-90.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 184.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1895.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 221.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-176.76%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK stands at 1083.44%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 1113.HK's 787.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-34.38%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 1113.HK is at 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1383.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1113.HK is 19.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Below 50% of 1113.HK's 1094.22%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 1113.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-99.62%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-14.83%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.21%
Negative asset growth while 1113.HK invests at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.05%
We have a declining book value while 1113.HK shows 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.85%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.