PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.96%
Positive revenue growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
159.62%
Positive gross profit growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
191.42%
Positive EBIT growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
161.85%
Positive operating income growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
181.23%
Net income growth of 181.23% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
175.00%
EPS growth of 175.00% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
175.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 175.00% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
7.72%
Share count expansion well above 1113.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.87%
Diluted share change of 9.87% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
621.17%
Positive OCF growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
299.67%
Positive FCF growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
36.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 1113.HK's 245.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1934.53%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 87.08%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
501.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 11.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
11.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 1113.HK's 796.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
539.76%
Below 50% of 1113.HK's 1269.10%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
558.73%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-19.45%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
142.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
203.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 1113.HK is at 38.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 1113.HK is at 21.60%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1113.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.86%
We show growth while 1113.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
15.61%
Positive asset growth while 1113.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
28.61%
Positive BV/share change while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-57.16%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.11%
SG&A growth well above 1113.HK's 26.71%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.