1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.29%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.14%
Positive gross profit growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
27.53%
Positive EBIT growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1410.11%
Positive operating income growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
28.96%
Net income growth above 1.5x 1113.HK's 0.51%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
22.70%
EPS growth of 22.70% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
32.10%
Diluted EPS growth of 32.10% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.48%
Share count expansion well above 1113.HK's 0.51%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-2.63%
Reduced diluted shares while 1113.HK is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.68%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-108.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1876.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
246.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 45.85%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.61%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
138.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
160.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 1113.HK is at 39.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
15.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 9.55%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 1113.HK's 10.07%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.66%
Similar asset growth to 1113.HK's 2.83%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
5.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 1113.HK's 0.07%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
25.60%
Debt growth far above 1113.HK's 14.77%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.