PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.24%
Positive revenue growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.44%
Positive gross profit growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
205.59%
Positive EBIT growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
191.41%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 1113.HK's 0.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
257.75%
Positive net income growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
258.37%
EPS growth of 258.37% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
247.06%
Diluted EPS growth of 247.06% while 1113.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.35%
Slight or no buybacks while 1113.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.58%
Slight or no buyback while 1113.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 1113.HK stands at 336.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.36%
Positive OCF growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-100.49%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
728.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 27.99%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
172.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 21.26%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
381.65%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
361.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
172.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1113.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Below 50% of 1113.HK's 35.38%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
23.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 1113.HK's 14.60%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.54%
We show growth while 1113.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.96%
Positive asset growth while 1113.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 1113.HK's 1.22%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.30%
We have some new debt while 1113.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.35%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 1113.HK's 124.31%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.