PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.35%
Negative revenue growth while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.41%
Gross profit growth of 1.41% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
36.84%
EBIT growth of 36.84% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
36.40%
Operating income growth of 36.40% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
9.25%
Net income growth of 9.25% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1290.30%
OCF growth of 1290.30% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
54.04%
FCF growth of 54.04% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-8.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
112.65%
OCF/share CAGR of 112.65% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-53.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-310.77%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-157.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 1177.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.31%
SG&A growth of 31.31% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.