PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.26%
10Y CAGR of 60.26% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
20.34%
5Y CAGR of 20.34% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
25.13%
3Y CAGR of 25.13% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
151.98%
OCF/share CAGR of 151.98% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
143.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 143.63% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
171.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 171.92% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
377.96%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 377.96% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
297.91%
Net income/share CAGR of 297.91% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
239.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 239.99% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.77%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-61.21%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.