1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.61%
Revenue growth under 50% of 1177.HK's 10.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.58%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 1177.HK's 13.30%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-11.10%
Negative EBIT growth while 1177.HK is at 1.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.60%
Negative operating income growth while 1177.HK is at 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.90%
Net income growth under 50% of 1177.HK's 11.94%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 1177.HK is at 3.92%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
7.52%
Share count expansion well above 1177.HK's 2.71%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above 1177.HK's 8.31%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
540.46%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 1177.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-9.43%
Negative OCF growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-44.60%
Negative FCF growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-15.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
17.93%
5Y CAGR of 17.93% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
19.98%
3Y CAGR of 19.98% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
4054.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 4054.01% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
2830.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 2830.25% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
9.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 9.91% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
106.33%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 106.33% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
220.57%
Net income/share CAGR of 220.57% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
553.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 553.43% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
459.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 459.48% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.46%
SG&A growth well above 1177.HK's 15.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.