1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-56.15%
Negative revenue growth while 1177.HK stands at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.21%
Positive gross profit growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.36%
Positive operating income growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
63.57%
Positive net income growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
64.07%
Positive EPS growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
64.07%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Negative OCF growth while 1177.HK is at 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-200.00%
Negative FCF growth while 1177.HK is at 11.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-99.95%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-99.95%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
84.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 1177.HK's 138.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-233.73%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-154.89%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-160.41%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 48.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-232.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-133.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-179.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1177.HK is 106.13%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 1177.HK invests at 55.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1612.24%
SG&A growth well above 1177.HK's 21.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.