PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.04%
Positive revenue growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
26.47%
Positive gross profit growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.15%
Positive EBIT growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.41%
Positive operating income growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.43%
Net income growth under 50% of 1177.HK's 28.42%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
15.79%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 1177.HK's 30.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
15.79%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 1177.HK's 30.23%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.75%
Slight or no buybacks while 1177.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.75%
Slight or no buyback while 1177.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.35%
OCF growth of 11.35% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-12.85%
Negative FCF growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-13.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
1379.14%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1177.HK's 66.39%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
551.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1177.HK's 23.46%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-122.95%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
56.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
44.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-206.81%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
77.04%
Below 50% of 1177.HK's 218.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-0.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1177.HK is 150.52%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.08%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 1177.HK is at 427.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-28.34%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 1177.HK is at 250.75%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.22%
Inventory growth well above 1177.HK's 4.23%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.35%
Asset growth well under 50% of 1177.HK's 8.42%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-8.73%
We have a declining book value while 1177.HK shows 4.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
53.68%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 1177.HK's 156.67%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.