PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.29%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.14%
Positive gross profit growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
27.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of 1177.HK's 181.93%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1410.11%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 1177.HK's 43.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
28.96%
Net income growth under 50% of 1177.HK's 243.19%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
22.70%
EPS growth under 50% of 1177.HK's 266.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
32.10%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 1177.HK's 242.74%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.48%
Slight or no buybacks while 1177.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-2.63%
Reduced diluted shares while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.68%
Negative OCF growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-108.88%
Negative FCF growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1876.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1177.HK's 81.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
246.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1177.HK's 37.95%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.61%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
138.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
Below 50% of 1177.HK's 1245.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
160.68%
Below 50% of 1177.HK's 986.90%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 1177.HK is at 197.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
15.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 1177.HK's 19.17%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.84%
We show growth while 1177.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.66%
Asset growth well under 50% of 1177.HK's 14.35%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.21%
Under 50% of 1177.HK's 34.06%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
25.60%
We have some new debt while 1177.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.