PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
71.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.12 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.45%
Revenue growth of 8.45% while 1177.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
12.25%
Gross profit growth of 12.25% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-89.47%
Negative EBIT growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-530.70%
Negative operating income growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-106.93%
Negative net income growth while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-107.21%
Negative EPS growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-107.36%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.79%
Share reduction while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.94%
Reduced diluted shares while 1177.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.89%
OCF growth of 80.89% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
89.37%
FCF growth of 89.37% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
40423.24%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
257.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
32.25%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
228.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
314.45%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-18.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
90.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-145.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-104.66%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3.96%
Positive growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
4.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while 1177.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
Inventory growth of 4.17% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.51%
Negative asset growth while 1177.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-12.81%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.23%
SG&A growth of 19.23% while 1177.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.