PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.13%
Revenue growth of 13.13% while 1475.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
60.12%
Gross profit growth of 60.12% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
41.06%
EBIT growth of 41.06% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
41.04%
Operating income growth of 41.04% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
68.98%
Net income growth of 68.98% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Share change of 1.52% while 1475.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.52%
Diluted share change of 1.52% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
331.97%
OCF growth of 331.97% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-84.41%
Negative FCF growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 47.94% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
370.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 1475.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.34%
SG&A growth of 81.34% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.