PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.51%
Share reduction while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.51%
Dividend growth of 0.51% while 1475.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
0.00%
OCF growth of 0.00% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
0.00%
FCF growth of 0.00% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 1475.HK's 38.71%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-7.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 3.43% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
137.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 137.43% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-25.82%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.67%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.67% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.