PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.61%
Revenue growth of 3.61% while 1475.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
2.58%
Gross profit growth of 2.58% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-11.10%
Negative EBIT growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.60%
Negative operating income growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.90%
Net income growth of 1.90% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
7.52%
Share change of 7.52% while 1475.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
10.21%
Diluted share change of 10.21% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
540.46%
Dividend growth of 540.46% while 1475.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.43%
Negative OCF growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-44.60%
Negative FCF growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-15.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 55.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
17.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 1475.HK's 38.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4054.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2830.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 2830.25% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
9.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 9.91% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
106.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
220.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
553.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
459.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 459.48% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.46%
SG&A growth of 23.46% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.