PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 55.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
17.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 1475.HK's 38.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
22.32%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4159.27%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2826.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 2826.08% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
12.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 12.05% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
111.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
220.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
566.17%
Positive short-term CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
470.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 470.39% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.