PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-56.15%
Negative revenue growth while 1475.HK stands at 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.21%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 1475.HK's 15.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.36%
Positive operating income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
63.57%
Positive net income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
64.07%
Positive EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
64.07%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Negative OCF growth while 1475.HK is at 19.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-200.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-99.95%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-99.95%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
84.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 3.65%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-233.73%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 19.42%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-154.89%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 1475.HK is at 19.42%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-160.41%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 19.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-232.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-133.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-179.33%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 1475.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1612.24%
SG&A growth well above 1475.HK's 16.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.