PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.96%
Positive revenue growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
159.62%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 1475.HK's 6.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
191.42%
Positive EBIT growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
161.85%
Positive operating income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
181.23%
Positive net income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
175.00%
Positive EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
175.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
7.72%
Slight or no buybacks while 1475.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
9.87%
Slight or no buyback while 1475.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
621.17%
OCF growth of 621.17% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
299.67%
FCF growth of 299.67% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
36.02%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to 1475.HK's 34.24%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
1934.53%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 29.51%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
501.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 2.18%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
11.06%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
539.76%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
558.73%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-19.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 1475.HK is at 83.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
142.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 1475.HK's 173.59%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
203.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 30.01%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 1475.HK is at 14.65%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.86%
Inventory growth well above 1475.HK's 20.50%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
15.61%
Positive asset growth while 1475.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
28.61%
Positive BV/share change while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-57.16%
We’re deleveraging while 1475.HK stands at 153.86%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.11%
SG&A growth well above 1475.HK's 18.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.