PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.29%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.14%
Positive gross profit growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
27.53%
Positive EBIT growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1410.11%
Positive operating income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
28.96%
Positive net income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.70%
Positive EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
32.10%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.48%
Slight or no buybacks while 1475.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-2.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.68%
Negative OCF growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-108.88%
Negative FCF growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1876.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 0.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
246.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 30.61%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.61%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
138.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 8.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
160.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 1475.HK's 272.22%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
15.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 1475.HK's 12.69%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 1475.HK's 7.78%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.66%
Positive asset growth while 1475.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.21%
Positive BV/share change while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
25.60%
We have some new debt while 1475.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.84%
We cut SG&A while 1475.HK invests at 6.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.