PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.24%
Positive revenue growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.44%
Positive gross profit growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
205.59%
Positive EBIT growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
191.41%
Positive operating income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
257.75%
Positive net income growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
258.37%
Positive EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
247.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.35%
Share count expansion well above 1475.HK's 0.70%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.58%
Slight or no buyback while 1475.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.36%
OCF growth of 3.36% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-100.49%
Negative FCF growth while 1475.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
728.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 19.14%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
172.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 42.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
381.65%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
361.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 24.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
172.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 85.00%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Below 50% of 1475.HK's 23.64%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
23.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 11.01%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.54%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 1475.HK's 7.99%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.96%
Positive asset growth while 1475.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.34%
Positive BV/share change while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.30%
We have some new debt while 1475.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.35%
SG&A growth well above 1475.HK's 2.21%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.