PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.45%
Positive revenue growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.25%
Positive gross profit growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-89.47%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-530.70%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-107.21%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-107.36%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.79%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.94%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.89%
OCF growth at 75-90% of 1475.HK's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
89.37%
FCF growth 75-90% of 1475.HK's 100.00%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
40423.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 42.41%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
257.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 24.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
32.25%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
228.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
314.45%
Positive OCF/share growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-18.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
90.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 42.52% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-145.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 1475.HK is 56.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-104.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 1475.HK is 62.78%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
3.96%
Equity/share CAGR of 3.96% while 1475.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
14.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 1475.HK's 7.44%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
4.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while 1475.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 1475.HK's 15.80%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.51%
Negative asset growth while 1475.HK invests at 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.49%
We have a declining book value while 1475.HK shows 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-12.81%
We’re deleveraging while 1475.HK stands at 96.95%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.23%
We expand SG&A while 1475.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.