1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Revenue growth of 2.34% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
24.74%
Gross profit growth of 24.74% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
84.81%
EBIT growth of 84.81% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
2295.40%
Operating income growth of 2295.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-42.74%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-57.93%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.18%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-61.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.30%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-7.85%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-8.69%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.14%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
3551.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.66%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
146.88%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 13.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
34.91%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.87%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
177.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 177.47% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
280.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 280.14% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-37.54%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
93.29%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.30% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
70.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 26.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
45.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 45.80% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-17.40%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 21.78%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
29.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
1.66%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.22%
We have slight inventory growth while Consumer Cyclical is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we expect bigger future sales or if peers see a looming downturn.
-10.57%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.71%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.67%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.19%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.