1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.35%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
1.41%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median of 2.16%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
36.84%
EBIT growth of 36.84% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
36.40%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
9.25%
Net income growth of 9.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1290.30%
OCF growth of 1290.30% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
54.04%
FCF growth of 54.04% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 18.13%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-8.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
112.65%
OCF/share CAGR of 112.65% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-53.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-310.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 49.78%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-157.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 29.40%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.31%
SG&A growth of 31.31% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.