1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
89.1K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.12 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.50%
Revenue growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 2.12%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
11.01%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.25%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
208.19%
EBIT growth of 208.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
208.19%
Operating income growth of 208.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
120.30%
Net income growth of 120.30% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
1.39%
Diluted share change of 1.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.39%
OCF growth of 108.39% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
218.43%
FCF growth of 218.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 25.42%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-2.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.03%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 4.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
87.68%
3Y OCF/share growth of 87.68% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.28%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 28.15%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-41.99%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.69%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.37%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.37%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.