PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
89.1K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.12 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.58%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
26.76%
Gross profit growth of 26.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1779.25%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.64%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
61.69%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
55.26%
Positive EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
58.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
19.83%
Share change of 19.83% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
14.75%
Diluted share change of 14.75% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-16.55%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
0.00%
OCF growth of 0.00% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
0.00%
FCF growth of 0.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
9.72%
10Y CAGR of 9.72% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-57.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-52.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
210.73%
OCF/share CAGR of 210.73% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-25.62%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
2100.08%
3Y OCF/share growth of 2100.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
232.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 232.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-75.58%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
140.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 140.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.53% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-53.47%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.