1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
71.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.12 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.97%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.10%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-99.97%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.37%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-99.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.89%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
44.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 44.80% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
20.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 20.87% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-9.13%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-124.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 64.20%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-183.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 28.89%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-111.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 65.33%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
605.53%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 605.53% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
692.20%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 692.20% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.