PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
71.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.12 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.50%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
12.43%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.38%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-275.35%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-274.29%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-274.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.21%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
13.10%
OCF growth of 13.10% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
21.15%
FCF growth of 21.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-99.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.33%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-99.52%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 21.05%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
1840.00%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.58%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-224.03%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-150.91%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-156.03%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-197.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 45.47%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-124.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 66.25%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-106.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 21.90%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
160.62%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-99.99%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-99.99%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.26%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.97%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.