PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-78.03%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
110.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.84%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.65%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-275.68%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-281.68%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-281.68%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.22%
Share change of 1.22% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
63.62%
OCF growth of 63.62% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
62.89%
FCF growth of 62.89% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-99.87%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.40%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-99.90%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.01%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-118.30%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-465.09%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 18.06%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-191.28%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 41.31%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.24%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.33%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.63%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.