1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14114.39%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-38888.36%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.14%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-212.09%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.28%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-439.49%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-438.03%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-438.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.25%
OCF growth of 61.25% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
52.52%
FCF growth of 52.52% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-92.12%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.88%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-93.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 20.45%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-589.49%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-125.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.25%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 19.23%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-289.32%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 14.18%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
820.38%
SG&A growth of 820.38% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.