PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
71.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.12 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.69%
Revenue growth of 75.69% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
187.44%
Gross profit growth of 187.44% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Operating income growth of 1.81% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-4.44%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.07%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-58.48%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-83.82%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 24.37%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
51804.85%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
2575.51%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-146.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-138.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
31.75%
3Y OCF/share growth of 31.75% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-804.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 36.25%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-742.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.40%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-307.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.97%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
176.96%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 16.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
6.27%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
36.39%
Inventory growth of 36.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-2.81%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.06%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.41%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
444.00%
Debt growth of 444.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.