PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.96%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
40.04%
Gross profit growth of 40.04% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-10.99%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-21.01%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-13.01%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-8.33%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-8.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.00%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.30%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-15.35%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-22.38%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 26.62%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
16567.76%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 18.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
439.30%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.78%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-164.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-243.68%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
11.86%
3Y OCF/share growth of 11.86% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-361.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 49.74%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-2464.06%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.28%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
81.18%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-16.80%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.44%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.85%
Inventory growth of 40.85% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
4.63%
Asset growth of 4.63% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-3.15%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.57%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
135.22%
Debt growth of 135.22% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
342.78%
SG&A growth of 342.78% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.