PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
37.14%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.33%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
34.50%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-29.21%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
8.25%
Operating income growth of 8.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-28.65%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-30.77%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-30.77%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.24%
Share change of 0.24% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.24%
Diluted share change of 0.24% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.56%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-1.94%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-3.78%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 24.33%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
11301.73%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 16.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
543.21%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.70%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-154.74%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
29.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 29.96% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-90.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-552.26%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 51.30%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-1545.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.17%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
40.64%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 19.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.62%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.51%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-40.12%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 8.76%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
20.44%
Inventory growth of 20.44% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.34%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-8.62%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
24.79%
Debt growth of 24.79% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.76%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.